This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] SMTP forwarding in the face of Data Protection Directive
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] SMTP forwarding in the face of Data Protection Directive
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] SMTP forwarding in the face of Data Protection Directive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Sat May 21 12:18:18 CEST 2011
On 21/May/11 09:05, Patrik Fältström wrote: > I still do not see what you are after, given the various rules > regarding "temporary storage" that exists. I'm not sure what rules you mean. Let's assume, for example, that I have the addresses of all cooperation-wg subscribers on my personal address-book. Then, if I send a message to all of us, my outgoing mail server will temporarily store the corresponding personal data for the sake of running my post through its queue. I think Data Protection Directive imposes no duty in such case. Is this what you mean? Let me note again how transparent a MLM is in doing its job. It lets recipients know which specific (non-temporary) list their address was extracted from. Not all list exploders work this way.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] SMTP forwarding in the face of Data Protection Directive
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] SMTP forwarding in the face of Data Protection Directive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]