Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:40:20 +0100 (CET)
Hallo!
Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Sabri Berisha sabri@localhost writes:
>
> > Perhaps you'd be better of adding this to the IRT objects?
> >
> > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-254.html
>
> Isn't the IRT object dead?
I never saw one :)
>
> Personally, I think it's more important to require functional (!)
> email (!) contacts for inetnum objects (and allocate the necessary
> manpower to be able to investigate reports of broken addresses)).
>
> Of course, this is whishful thinking because no one is going to pay
> for the work involved.
Many ISPs have abuse contacts. For those customers who don't have any
(or where the customers themself are spamming), I suggested to make the abuse
contact mandatory for allocations (= added by the hostmasters).
MfG / Regards,
S.Willing
************************************************************************
M / W / S Sebastian Willing
http://www.mops.net Technical director
Telefon: 01803/684310578 e-Mail: s.willing@localhost
Telefax: 01805/445169111 SW88-RIPE
************************************************************************