<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: failure notice


On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Piet Beertema wrote:
[...]
> that is non-RFC-conformant is subject to discussion. Personally I
> don't bounce them, but I treat them as spam and silently discard
> them. A warning might be better, but why should I educate spammers?

Apparently, you are only mailed by spammers? Then I know a spamfilter
that'll actually save you money :)

The bounces/reject messages are there for the legitimate mailers, who
happen to get caught in the filter.

-- 
#!perl -pl	# This kenny-filter is virus-free as long as you don't copy it
$p=3-2*/[^\W\dmpf_]/i;s.[a-z]{$p}.vec($f=join('',$p-1?chr(sub{$_[0]*9+$_[1]*3+
$_[2]}->(map{/p|f/i+/f/i}split//,$&)+97):('m',p,f)[map{((ord$&)%32-1)/$_%3}(9,
3,1)]),5,1)='`'lt$&;$f.eig;				   # Jan-Pieter Cornet



<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>