Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: failure notice
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:02:45 +0100
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Piet Beertema wrote:
[...]
> that is non-RFC-conformant is subject to discussion. Personally I
> don't bounce them, but I treat them as spam and silently discard
> them. A warning might be better, but why should I educate spammers?
Apparently, you are only mailed by spammers? Then I know a spamfilter
that'll actually save you money :)
The bounces/reject messages are there for the legitimate mailers, who
happen to get caught in the filter.
--
#!perl -pl # This kenny-filter is virus-free as long as you don't copy it
$p=3-2*/[^\W\dmpf_]/i;s.[a-z]{$p}.vec($f=join('',$p-1?chr(sub{$_[0]*9+$_[1]*3+
$_[2]}->(map{/p|f/i+/f/i}split//,$&)+97):('m',p,f)[map{((ord$&)%32-1)/$_%3}(9,
3,1)]),5,1)='`'lt$&;$f.eig; # Jan-Pieter Cornet