This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Sun Apr 7 14:42:43 CEST 2024
On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote: >>>> Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number >>>> assignment? >>> Because your ISP can't be bothered. >> Is such unbotherability legitimate? > > these years, it is one of the things when considering a provider from > which one gets address space. > > part of the problem is that this used not to be the case. "rdns is not > really useful" was the common thought. so many isps did not pay it much > attention. now, more and more services are using rdns mapping to defend > against crapola. so it has become useful, and quite needed in some > cases. > > but it is notalways easy to justify to management the costs of cleaning > it up, often involving your provider, sometimes your provider's > provider, and on up the chain. RIPE could at least reproach those LIRs that have an inet6num but no rDNS delegation to it. BTW, how should one search DB objects like 2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa? I can search it in the DNS but not in https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]