This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Apr 6 19:54:27 CEST 2024
>>> Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number >>> assignment? >> Because your ISP can't be bothered. > Is such unbotherability legitimate? these years, it is one of the things when considering a provider from which one gets address space. part of the problem is that this used not to be the case. "rdns is not really useful" was the common thought. so many isps did not pay it much attention. now, more and more services are using rdns mapping to defend against crapola. so it has become useful, and quite needed in some cases. but it is notalways easy to justify to management the costs of cleaning it up, often involving your provider, sometimes your provider's provider, and on up the chain. i have three /48s from an upstream. rdns is delegated, whew! but they are not dnssec signing. this has yet to cause pain, but i expect it will somewhere down the road. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]