[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:39:28AM +0100, jordi.palet--- via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> 2017-02 doesn???t enforce people really using the abuse-c, 

Neither does your proposal to require verification...  all it does is
require "if a mail from the NCC comes in, click on the confirmation
button".

People not interested in abuse handling will not magically become interested
by having a regular check whether the mailbox is working - actually, to
the contrary, if the abuse mailbox bounces, you know right away that they
are not interested.

*Should* they be?  Of course!

Will your proposal magically achieve that?  no.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231129/f3107105/attachment.sig>