[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> We do this in many other places, it's called voluntary norms for responsible
> behaviour, and is seen as a great tool to improve things. Happy to explain
> more if there is an interest.

It's not like these norms do not exist today - abuse contacts have to be
provided already today.  Responsible ISPs read these mailboxes and act
upon them.

Forcing everybody through a "you must click here to validate your abuse
contact, otherwise bad things will happen to your resources" cycle in the
vague hope that this is something irresponsible ISPs will fail to do so
(or that it will magically turn them into responsible ISPs) is pure
wishful thinking.

I have better things to do with my time than jump through hoops that do
not serve an effect besides "look, we *are* doing something! better than
nothing!".  No, something needs to be provably *effective* before being
*forced* on everybody.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231101/d12af22f/attachment.sig>