[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:10:45AM +0100, jordi.palet--- via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> We had a policy proposal to ensure that the abuse mailbox was valid and monitored, but this community didn???t liked it. In other regions it works and it proven to be a very valid tool.

You failed to demonstrate why "the mailbox is monitored in a way that 
satisfies the proposed policy" would imply "the ISP in question suddenly
gets interested in acting against abuse".  Especially those that promote
themselves as "bulletproof hosting".

This is what the community did not like - added bureaucracy with no 
provable gain.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231101/21d9d928/attachment.sig>