This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kristijonas Lukas Bukauskas
ripe at n0.lt
Thu Mar 4 02:52:12 CET 2021
On 2021-03-04 03:26, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > As far as I can see that is probably an artefact of an overly helpful > customer service person trying to troubleshoot mail delivery for you I've seen various sources (not sure if they are sufficient to drive any conclusions though) that Microsoft actually does use uceprotect. But you might be right. Microsoft has odd filtering algorithms: I've experienced their very own e-mails (from SNDS, Microsoft Azure, even auto-replies from Business Conduct and Compliance) delivered to the junk unless you manually mark them as not junk. I'm having the higher -- Customer Relationship Management -- to clarify it for me. But I'm not that positive that they will disclose if they use uceprotect. -- Regards, Kristijonas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20210304/3aa56c5f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]