[anti-abuse-wg] Anti-social assholes

P.S.

I forgot to include "We don't have access to the server so we will have to
wait until the customer responds".

You can't see the data the server is sending or the spam links i've
supplied to you?

After they say they "fixed the problem", you can clearly see that it's
still not fixed and any further attempt to reply goes ignored.

That has been my experience with most cloud hosting providers.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 8:48 AM steve payne <stevenp8844 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The problem with the online form report abuse is that you can only submit
> 1 url at a time.
>
> When you submit the url, then they will ask for more information. The same
> as sending to abuse@
>
> Once you submit the additional information, you usually do not hear
> anything back from these cloud hosting providers and I rarely see anything
> happen.
>
> The "abuse" they are looking for is email spam generated from their
> servers that do not follow the CAN-SPAM act. Any other type of "abuse" is
> not "abuse" as the usual response is "Oh I found what your're talking about
> i've fixed the problem".
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 9:02 PM JJS JJS <no0484985 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To put it alternatively:
>>
>> Imagine you walk down a street and there are lots of pubs (saloons?) that
>> serve Alcohol and they all have drunken people swearing and trashing the
>> place and you ask to report it to the manager but the bouncer of one
>> premises says... "You have to put it in writing via email" and the next
>> premises says "you have to telephone during business hours" and another
>> says "you have to write a letter to an address".
>>
>>
>> That is their choice. Sometimes with forms, it pre-loads it into a system
>> that formats it for them. Sometimes there are email systems that can
>> extract that information and format it anyway. But if they want you to use
>> a form, they are indicating that's the best way for them to know what is
>> happening.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21/02/2021 2:38 pm, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>
>> I get an email spam so I report it... via email.
>>
>> I *do not * don snorkle gear.  I do not contort my body into odd
>> shapes.  I do not make my report out-of-band, via smoke signals,
>> or morse code, or via modulated infrared wavelengths.
>>
>> Call me old fashioned, but as I have already made plain, I do not think
>> that I should be required to do any of these things.  It is easier for
>> me just to block all of Hostdime, which I had plenty of reasons to
>> do already anyway.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> rfg
>>
>>
>> P.S.  Seriously, how much arrogance does it take for them to say to
>> me that it is OK for me to have taken up *my* time to have read the
>> crap that was originated by *their* customer, but *they* cannot be
>> bothered to read *my* mail to them?
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Forwarded Message
>>
>> Date:    Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:47:33 -0500
>> From:    abuse at hostdime.com <abuse at hostdime.com>
>> To:      rfg at tristatelogic.com
>> Subject: [AUTOREPLY] - Please submit complaint to https://www.hostdime.com/abus
>> 	  e-report/
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for contacting HostDime.
>>
>> Please resubmit your original message at the following link for action to be co
>> nsidered:
>> - -------------------
>> HostDime Abuse Report Formhttps://www.hostdime.com/abuse-report/
>> - -------------------
>> Thank you,
>> HostDime.com, Inc
>>
>> NOTE: This is an automated message. Please do not reply to this email. This mai
>> lbox is not monitored.
>>
>> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20210221/35f6b3d6/attachment.html>