This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat May 9 23:28:50 CEST 2020
Hi everyone, On Sat, 9 May 2020, Sander Steffann wrote: > Hi Randy, > >>> Otherwise we change the way the working Groups works it will remain >>> unchanged for ever. I agree that we must get a way to vote or another >>> democratic way to get decisions. >> (...) >> >> for a large segment of the community, and that which was pretty much >> the original population, there is an underlying physics and shared >> experience of moving packets, routing, circuits, bgp, ixen, ... that >> gives us a common experience and understanding. I must note, however, that security is embedded inside "..." *sigh* Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]