This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: botnet controllers]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Jul 8 23:19:39 CEST 2020
If I found that any of your IP addresses is abusing my networks, I've the perfect right to black list your entire network and even more, make my decision public, so others can follow my advice. Specially if you don't take measures to log your network (despite is legally mandatory or not) and ensure that you don't have "bad" customers on it. This is perfectly legal. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 8/7/20 22:17, "anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de info at fos-vpn.org" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de info at fos-vpn.org> escribió: If Spamhaus lists our prefixes on EDROP it's their decision, we have to live with that, but they don't have the right to blacklist clean prefixes of hosting providers which host our service, because that is a form of punishment. Spamhaus is no legal entity and does therefore not have the right to do that. I don't say that all SBL entries are invalid, but some of them definitly are, because we have checked them. On 2020-07-08 22:00, Esa Laitinen wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, 15:47 , <info at fos-vpn.org> wrote: > >> It is true that VPN services which don't log any user activities >> attract >> people with bad intentions and believe me: We are not happy about >> that >> either...but we have to live with that > > As per your own admission, you have to live with people abusing your > service, but it doesn't mean others have the same obligation. > > If you do serve people abusing your service by doing things warranting > spamhaus listing as per they policy, why should spamhaus stop listing > those IP addresses? By your own admission, the listing is correct. > > It is up to you to come up with a solution that will stop your users > abusing internet resources not belonging to you, and other intenet > users are not obligated to accept such abuse. > > As for extending the listing to cover the whole subnet, it is called > escalation. Look it up, it is explained in spamhauses web page. > > Yours, > > esa > > ps. to put it simply: you're entitled to send crap to the internet. > Others are entitled to refuse receiving it. ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: botnet controllers]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]