This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Esa Laitinen
esa at laitinen.org
Wed Jul 8 22:00:59 CEST 2020
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, 15:47 , <info at fos-vpn.org> wrote: > > It is true that VPN services which don't log any user activities attract > people with bad intentions and believe me: We are not happy about that > either...but we have to live with that As per your own admission, you have to live with people abusing your service, but it doesn't mean others have the same obligation. If you do serve people abusing your service by doing things warranting spamhaus listing as per they policy, why should spamhaus stop listing those IP addresses? By your own admission, the listing is correct. It is up to you to come up with a solution that will stop your users abusing internet resources not belonging to you, and other intenet users are not obligated to accept such abuse. As for extending the listing to cover the whole subnet, it is called escalation. Look it up, it is explained in spamhauses web page. Yours, esa ps. to put it simply: you're entitled to send crap to the internet. Others are entitled to refuse receiving it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200708/4abb20c1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]