[anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Database and routing people who haven’t worked security or don’t want security roles trying to lecture people who work cert and abuse roles on why something abuse mitigation related won’t work is always interesting. Not you Randy but many other posters in this thread.

--srs

________________________________
From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 5:21 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

> Itʼd be interesting to take individual names of the people most vocal
> in their objections and feed them through LinkedIn - that assumption
> you made about dealing with spam would soon be tested.

give me a hand here. how is this construcive and helpful for the
internet operations community?

randy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200117/a0a8d148/attachment.html>