<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="direction: ltr;">Database and routing people who haven’t worked security or don’t want security roles trying to lecture people who work cert and abuse roles on why something abuse mitigation related won’t work is always interesting. Not you Randy
but many other posters in this thread.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="ms-outlook-ios-signature">
<div style="direction: ltr;">--srs</div>
</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Randy Bush <randy@psg.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, January 17, 2020 5:21 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Suresh Ramasubramanian<br>
<b>Cc:</b> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
<div> </div>
</font></div>
> Itʼd be interesting to take individual names of the people most vocal <br>
> in their objections and feed them through LinkedIn - that assumption <br>
> you made about dealing with spam would soon be tested. <br>
<br>
give me a hand here. how is this construcive and helpful for the <br>
internet operations community? <br>
<br>
randy <br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>