[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

I think if we try to agree on those ratings, we will never reach consensus ...

So it is not just easier to ask the abuse-c mailboxes that don't want to process to setup an autoresponder with an specific (standard) text about that, for example:

"This is an automated convirmation that you reached the correct abuse-c mailbox, but we don't process abuse cases, so your reports will be discarded."

This will be still in line with the actual policy (and the proposal modifications) and will allow the operators to decide if they want to be good netcitizens or not, and the victims to decide if they want to block them.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 14/1/20 2:46, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Ronald F. Guilmette" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de rfg at tristatelogic.com> escribió:

    In message <CD95F06AD1A1624FB3E613B62842F4D30236249784 at SRV-MAIL10-MB1.inteco.local>, 
    =?utf-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEdvbnrDoWxleiBCZXJkYXNjbw==?= <angel.gonzalez at incibe.es> wrote:
    
    >Well, I do see the value of an option (a magic email value?) meaning "this
    >entity supports the use of its network for abusive purposes and will take no
    >action on any abuse report".
    >
    >That would save time for everyone involved, and would allow to easily block
    >those networks from accesing ours!
    
    These are pretty much my sentiments exactly.
    
    The only questions remaining are:
    
       1)   Should there just be a simple yes/no one-bit flag published for
            each resource holder, or would a scale and a range of possible
            "rating" values be more useful?
    
       2)   How shall the "ratings" be computed and by whom?
    
    I have provided my personal opinions on both of these points in my
    prior posting.
    
    
    Regards,
    rfg
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.