[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

In message <CD95F06AD1A1624FB3E613B62842F4D30236249784 at SRV-MAIL10-MB1.inteco.local>, 
=?utf-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEdvbnrDoWxleiBCZXJkYXNjbw==?= <angel.gonzalez at incibe.es> wrote:

>Well, I do see the value of an option (a magic email value?) meaning "this
>entity supports the use of its network for abusive purposes and will take no
>action on any abuse report".
>
>That would save time for everyone involved, and would allow to easily block
>those networks from accesing ours!

These are pretty much my sentiments exactly.

The only questions remaining are:

   1)   Should there just be a simple yes/no one-bit flag published for
        each resource holder, or would a scale and a range of possible
        "rating" values be more useful?

   2)   How shall the "ratings" be computed and by whom?

I have provided my personal opinions on both of these points in my
prior posting.


Regards,
rfg