This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge Droz
serge.droz at first.org
Sun Apr 19 10:19:27 CEST 2020
Hi David Thanks for the feedback. - UN GGE: The 2015 group came up with a consensus report: https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/174 The 2017 failed. Personally I think, because the rising tensions in the global political climate, but that's another discussion. And I feat the current GGE as well as the OEWG will face the same fate. These are not good times for international state agreements. I completely agree with your assessment here. Re RIPE: I guess so. But if RIPE is seen as representing the community, than it should be ok for RIPE to enforce the community view. It was said here before: If we fail as an informal community here, than others will take this into their hands, and that will likely no procude a better result. Best Serge On 19/04/2020 00:07, David Conrad wrote: > Serge, > > On Apr 17, 2020, at 2:15 AM, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg > <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>> wrote: >> Even the UN (through the UN GGE and the OEWG, create norms for >> responsible behavior in cyber space. >> >> There is nothing that stops us from doing the same in this corner of >> internet policy. > > Perhaps not the best example. UN "Global Group of Experts” (GGE) tried > to come up with “cyber norms", but ultimately failed to get their norms > accepted (that is, they were unable to come to consensus on the final > report). As a result, another round of UN > GGE (https://www.un.org/disarmament/group-of-governmental-experts/) > kicked off and a parallel effort, the Open Ended Working Group, is also > trying to come up with a set of cyber norms, albeit with a larger set of > players. > > However, the reason (in my view) the UN cyber norm efforts have failed > to date is the same reason we see failures to come up with agreed upon > policies here: the norms would impact self-interest in a way that is > unacceptable to parties who have the ability to derail progress. > >> Neutrality does not imply the absence of values. If we want the internet >> to be usable and safe for users, we need to come up with what is >> acceptable behavior and what is not. > > My impression is that the issue that derails consensus here is whether > or not RIPE-NCC is the appropriate enforcer of “acceptable behavior”. > > Regards, > -drc > -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) Phone +41 76 542 44 93 | serge.droz at first.org | https://www.first.org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]