[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

More a question of locus standi - how many court cases have we seen so far where an RIR has filed a brief or an affidavit making such a point?

--srs

________________________________
From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2019 2:37 PM
To: Ronald F. Guilmette
Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

On Sat, May 18, 2019, 11:03 PM Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com<mailto:rfg at tristatelogic.com>> wrote:
>And yes, Kazakhstanian court also thinks IP addresses are property.  Do you
>consider yourself in a good company now?

I am not in a position to argue with the opinions of either Kazakhstan
coyrts or U.S. courts.

That is a nice phrase!  For your information, courts rely on independent subject matter experts to make adequate decisions, and you now admit that you do not have enough experience and/or expertise to testify about such things in a court to persuade a judge even in your own country of origin.  That is, well, a reason to shut down quite a few discussions on that list now :-)

--
Töma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190519/400615a5/attachment.html>