[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

On Sat, May 18, 2019, 11:03 PM Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com>
wrote:

> >And yes, Kazakhstanian court also thinks IP addresses are property.  Do
> you
> >consider yourself in a good company now?
>
> I am not in a position to argue with the opinions of either Kazakhstan
> coyrts or U.S. courts.
>

That is a nice phrase!  For your information, courts rely on independent
subject matter experts to make adequate decisions, and you now admit that
you do not have enough experience and/or expertise to testify about such
things in a court to persuade a judge even in your own country of origin.
That is, well, a reason to shut down quite a few discussions on that list
now :-)

--
Töma

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190519/7c0ecbf8/attachment.html>