[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

On Sat, 18 May 2019, Sérgio Rocha wrote:

> We belong to this group: " Some people are really thankful when they receive
> a notice and they understand they have something to fix. :-)"
> And we would be more happy if we have sure that all the abuse contacts are
> real, at least in RIPE region.

About the "at least in RIPE region", there is text on 2019-04 about that:

=====
c. Alignment with other RIRs:
A similar proposal has been accepted in APNIC (being implemented) and is 
under discussion in the LACNIC, AFRINIC and ARIN regions.
=====

i.e. 1 region on track, 4 still to go (RIPE included here).


Cheers,
Carlos



> Sérgio Rocha
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anti-abuse-wg [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of
> Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 23:52 PM
> To: Taras Heichenko <tasic at hostmaster.ua>
> Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of
> "abuse-mailbox")
>
>
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019, Taras Heichenko wrote:
>
>>> My team has nearly sent out 6000 abuse reports (only about intrusion
> attempts and brute force attacks) since Jan 1st this year.
>>> I've just checked, and only 2.5% bounced. 2018's bounces were around
> 4.5%.
>>
>> Did you calculate percentage of deliberate reactions to your abuse
> reports?
>
> No, not yet.
>
>
>> What is main purpose to deliver letter without problem or to get
> deliberate reaction to it?
>
> We assume some of the nasty stuff we see comes from infected devices. If
> legitimate owners care to desinfect, it's possible we will receive less
> events... i.e. everyone should be sending out more notices. Some people are
> really thankful when they receive a notice and they understand they have
> something to fix. :-)
>
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>