[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:53:02AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> > So that's a fairly effective way to sanction abusive behaviour.
> 
> The amount of time that will transpire from the time of abuse and a LIR 
> closed and their resources withdrawn can well be in excess of a year if 
> not two years.
> 
> Is that the end result we are looking for?

I would hope that *having* a way to sanction abusive behaviour would
deter criminals from doing so in the first place.  Today, not enough
people care, and playing havoc with BGP (intentional or accidentially) 
has hardly any consequences at all.

OTOH, these are the questions that make me undecided on the proposal :-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190320/e2934151/attachment.sig>