[anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update

Hi Brian, All,

This is a doubt i have about the PDP:

If concerns are addressed within a new text version, aren't people that 
have opposed the previous version required to state if they agree or 
not that their concerns were addressed...?

If those opposing remain silent the default interpretation will be that 
they are still opposing the proposal, even if the text they have opposed 
to is not there anymore?

Can you please clarify?

Thanks,
Carlos


On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Brian Nisbet wrote:

(...)
>>
>> one.  can we assume that the co-chairs and marco have memory, or do we all
>> need to restate our views, maybe even after reading a new version?
>
> Yes, you can assume this.
>
> I mean, we would, of course, strongly suggest that people read the new version, as we're sure you all will, and we're sure the authors would appreciate knowing if this version is better or worse, from the point of view of the members of the WG, but yes, we have memory.
>
> Obviously if we reach a Concluding Phase and the Co-Chairs determination is other than what any member believes it should be, there are further opportunities to comment at that point.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
> Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
>
>