This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Apr 26 10:20:11 CEST 2019
Randy, > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> > Sent: Thursday 25 April 2019 19:32 > To: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> > Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update > > > The four week discussion phase for 2019-03 officially ended just over > > a week ago. Since then, while there has been further welcome > > discussion on list, the WG Co-Chairs have been discussing the next > > steps with the proposers and the NCC Policy Officer. We have reached > > the following conclusions. > > > > 2019-03 will now move into the Review Phase, with a new version of the > > policy coming to the list in the next couple of days. Along with this > > the NCC will start their Impact Analysis which they will share as soon > > as possible. > > > > This does not imply any judgement regarding consensus or lack of > > consensus for 2019-03, but the Co-Chairs feel it is the best way to > > both bring the new draft of the proposed policy to you all *and* > > obtain the vital information from the NCC their understanding of the > > policy and likely impact. > > > > It is at the end of the Review Phase that a decision regarding > > consensus will be made. > > > > As always, please let me know if you have any questions. > > one. can we assume that the co-chairs and marco have memory, or do we all > need to restate our views, maybe even after reading a new version? Yes, you can assume this. I mean, we would, of course, strongly suggest that people read the new version, as we're sure you all will, and we're sure the authors would appreciate knowing if this version is better or worse, from the point of view of the members of the WG, but yes, we have memory. Obviously if we reach a Concluding Phase and the Co-Chairs determination is other than what any member believes it should be, there are further opportunities to comment at that point. Thanks, Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal 2019-03 Update
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]