[anti-abuse-wg] AS24940 Hetzner -- non-role contact wanted

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:06:44 -0700
"Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
> ac <ac at main.me> you wrote:
> >rfg wrote:  
> >> defend spammers AND those who sell them services.  You aren't by
> >> any chance in the bulk emailing business, or in the bulk emailing
> >> support business yourself, are you?    Sorry, but under the
> >> circumstances I think it is altogether reasonable to ask.
> >everyone knows what and whom you are.   
> A simple yes or no would do.
> 
so we are no longer talking about my underwear? 

> I'll repeat the question.
> Are you yourself in the bulk emailing business, or do you provide
> support services to those who are?
> 

When American spammers, who are actually TRANSMITTING the email spam
(and not providing network routing) abuses the Internet (and the
planet) by growing their businesses, this is perfectly fine, as this
does not fit your "agenda" 

UBE (which is an archaic concept, btw) providers are dead easy to block
or drop

> It's a fairly simple question.  Are you reluctant to provide a clear
> answer?
>
Okay, clear and direct answers about myself:

I do not like underwear much :)

And, No, I do not work for any one of the American Spammers and spam
transmitters (Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Micorosft, etc) 

I also do not transmit, empower or relay any unsolicited bulk email.
 
> If you're going to be giving advice to people for how they should or
> should not be attempting to get spammers removed from the Internet,
> then maybe you should first reveal whether or not you personally have
> any vested personal interest in the matter which might possibly color
> your opinions on this specific topic.
> 
I am not providing any advice except for stating that you are either
ignorant or technically incompetent.

Maybe you can answer a simple question and tell me which one it is?

Are you Ignorant or technically incompetent?

Andre