This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 02:23:14 CEST 2019
Fat fingers, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote: > Honestly, I think it's the opposite. If the NCC terminates a > membership agreement, it should be liable for all the consequences of > a wrong decision no matter how exactly the decision is made and what > arbiters/experts/oracles/grandmoms were asked for a definitive advice. .., because if it turns out that the experts or oracles prepared a bad advice, it would be the NCC's responsibility for not choosing a better set of experts of oracles. In any case, an individual won't be able to compensate a financial damage of an average ISP being shut down anyway, so it must be an org, and highly unlikely it could be that individual's employer. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]