This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Levine
johnl at iecc.com
Sat May 5 17:27:04 CEST 2018
In article <8a493c0.bf1cb7ed.16330c2a199 at gmx.ch> you write: >Okay my "vast" majority was a bit misleading. I meant the majority of users/companies already in whois :-) >So just the natural persons remain. But why should their right on their private data not count? Of course they count. But since they are an exception, a reasonable policy would publish the info for the 99% of domains registered by organizations and redact it for the 1% registered by people. It's not hard to do, the .CA registry has done it for years, which is well known to anyone who is familiar with this issue. Regards, John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]