[anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states

​​

*INTERNET* is a PRIVATE network of networks, builded by *USA* Department of
Defense, Army Forces and universities, americans and europeans.

*INTERNET* uses PUBLIC PROTOCOLS to allow communications betwen people and
companies.

*INTERNET* is NOT a POLITICAL NETWORK, and should not be treated like a
POLITICAL environment - or a digital State.

One of the biggest issues on *INTERNET* is the fact email is used to
transport files while *FTP* is the right protocol to transport files.

And NOBODY seems to care about it. This is an immense cost to operate
*INTERNET.*
>
> "In any case, this" invisible "exercise of power under the guise of"
> secret "algorithms and" proprietary "technology is extremely harmful and a
> powerful weapon in the hands of the evil organization (s).
>

What do you mean, "in the hands of evil organizations"? Do you consider the
invasion of Islam in Europe, and the NoZones in Sweden, England,
Norway as "*organizations
of good*"?

The answer is more regulation?
>

What do you mean by "more regulation"? More INTERVENTION OF THE STATE IN
THE PRIVATE LIFE of the people who are using the INTERNET?

But is not this exactly what Cuba, China, Russia do? Not to mention the
"States of Good" - Iran, Iraq, Syria and other Muslim countries?

Is the answer to look more the Chinese example?
>

What, exactly, in the "Chinese example" is "good" for people using the
INTERNET?

The answer is an Internet not free?

It depends on your definition of "free". There is no free lunch, and if you
do not pay a fee to use the * INTERNET,* you PAY TAX in your country to pay
for the *INTERNET,* as governments pay to subsidize the existence of the
*INTERNET.*

How do societies and societies protect their own cultures? Your own ways of
> life, your own values ​​and preserve your own freedoms? "
>

The "culture" of people who "buy" the "culture" of other people do not have
strength (culture) in their societies to provide their own culture for
their people. Americans say "cosmos" to say sidereal space and the Russians
say "OK" to say they agree.

*The Voice* is a "sold" program for virtually ALL CULTURES on Earth, *...
Got Talent* and *X Factor* as well.

What, exactly, do you mean with countries "*losing" their cultures*?"

Google is a private company.

You may want to refer to the creation of a Private Monopoly, as was done by
the *US* Congress with the telephone.

In the Clinton administration, the same *US* Congress broke the private
monopoly formerly created to protect the economic interests of the
inventor, forcing the private company to be sold to become a *MARKET* in
the industry, since there was no longer any justification for protecting
the inventor.

is this what you mean?

I use google but I use more *DuckDuckGo.com*, other people can do the same,
but DO NOT WANT.

I use *TOR* - and google does not like you to use *TOR* and HARDS access to
their computers when you use *TOR* - and I invest in *MY SECURITY*.

I do not use FACEBOOK or INSTAGRAM or WHATSAPP for the same reasons: my
INSECURITY and the SAFETY of those companies.

I do not miss the "services" that those companies offer, where YOU ARE THE
PRODUCT.

And the amount of people who *"sells"* their private lives easily to those
companies producing PROFIT is almost 20% of the Earth's population.

You mean that companies are to blame?

Would not you agree if you said that the same people who give away their
private lives for the easy profit of better able people are the GUILTS of
their countries and their societies LOSING THEIR CULTURES?

But these people have HIGH EDUCATION and money. How would you explain this?

That almost 20% of Earth's population is a terrorist? Traitors of their
cultures and their homelands?

There are several Search Engines
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=open+source+search+engines&t=seamonkey&ia=web>
that can be used in Internet Service Providers and private companies,
especially in universities and mid-level schools, including government
agencies, but what you see is a public university paying Google to do
the documents
in their academic environment. Even the university's information technology
course DOES NOT DEVELOP RESEARCH in the area of ​​textual information
retrieval.

"Sphinx

[image: Top 5 Open Source Search Engines - Image 5]

Sphinx is an open source full text search server that is programmed with
relevant search quality and integration simplicity.
Sphinx allows flexible testing whereby its indexing features include full
support for SBCS and UTF-8 encodings, stopword removal and optional hit
position removal (hitless indexing); morphology and synonym processing
through word forms dictionaries and stemmers; exceptions and blended
characters; and many more.
Sphinx has an easy application integration that is derived from 3 different
APIs. It has a native library for many programming languages, a pluggable
storage engine for MySQL and an application query that uses MySQL client
library and syntax.
Websites such as Craigslist, Living Social, MetaCafe and Groupon has
adopted Sphinx for its searches.

*Programming Language:* C++
*License: *GPLv2 and commercial
*Ranking of search results:* Versatile
*Indexing style:* SQL database indexing and Non-SQL storage indexing."


No government agency from the countries you claim to be victims of Google
(and other *IT* companies) uses, or research, retrieval of textual
information in their corporate environments.

And most of the societies you want to protect send their brains to compete
for a job in Google and *US* *IT* companies.

Is this American's FAULT?

Do you misuse wrong high-tech companies working together with the
government of the country that they help with taxes and give them national
and global MARKET SAFETY?

Which government do you think companies should help? To the government of
Iran? To the government of Syria? To the government of Russia? To the
government of China?

Are you saying that *US* high-tech companies should pay taxes to CHINA
ALSO? To be "*good*"?

Are you saying that *US* *IT* companies should deliver their data
encryption protocols to China? To be "*good*"?

"The Internet is a global network."

*INTERNET* is a NETWORK of computer networks and was created in the *USA,*
and is owned by the *US* government. It only exists within the territory of
the *USA.* Other nations may use it if they adhere to the protocols - which
are OPEN and FREE ACCESS CODE for ALL EARTH INHABITANTS.

"
*Use of that global network by dominant and large tech companies to**empower
single country military is evil.* "

The "*bad*" is not the use of a property by the owner, but those who are
not owners want to have the right of the owner without doing anything for
the existence of the property.

What you are saying is that you are a "*homeless*" and those who have a
roof have a duty to give you the roof.

​You could agree that there is a need for regulation to PROTECT INDIVIDUAL
RIGHTS of users of the *INTERNET,* with protocols - open like the ones in
the network - to verify the correct use of the network.

But this is another conversation and you do not want regulation to protect
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, you want a Digital State to intervene in national
societies for IMPOR sanctions on individuals, and companies, because at the
time of regular there is no distinction between person and company.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180506/4b4e4225/attachment.html>