<div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:rgb(0,0,0)"> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:rgb(0,0,0)">INTERNET is a PRIVATE network of networks, builded by USA Department of Defense, Army Forces and universities, americans and europeans. INTERNET uses PUBLIC PROTOCOLS to allow communications betwen people and companies. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:rgb(0,0,0)">INTERNET is NOT a POLITICAL NETWORK, and should not be treated like a POLITICAL environment - or a digital State. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:large;color:rgb(0,0,0)">One of the biggest issues on INTERNET is the fact email is used to transport files while FTP is the right protocol to transport files. </div>And NOBODY seems to care about it. This is an immense cost to operate INTERNET. <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span title=""De qualquer forma, este exercício" invisível "de poder sob o disfarce de" segredo " algoritmos e tecnologia "proprietária" é extremamente prejudicial e uma poderosa arma nas mãos da organização do mal (s).">"In any case, this" invisible "exercise of power under the guise of" secret "algorithms and" proprietary "technology is extremely harmful and a powerful weapon in the hands of the evil organization (s). <span title=""De qualquer forma, este exercício" invisível "de poder sob o disfarce de" segredo " algoritmos e tecnologia "proprietária" é extremamente prejudicial e uma poderosa arma nas mãos da organização do mal (s)."></blockquote> What do you mean, "in the hands of evil organizations"? Do you consider the invasion of Islam in Europe, and the NoZones in Sweden, England, Norway as "organizations of good"? <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The answer is more regulation? </blockquote> What do you mean by "more regulation"? More INTERVENTION OF THE STATE IN THE PRIVATE LIFE of the people who are using the INTERNET? But is not this exactly what Cuba, China, Russia do? Not to mention the "States of Good" - Iran, Iraq, Syria and other Muslim countries? <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Is the answer to look more the Chinese example? </blockquote> What, exactly, in the "Chinese example" is "good" for people using the INTERNET? <blockquote>The answer is an Internet not free?</blockquote>It depends on your definition of "free". There is no free lunch, and if you do not pay a fee to use the INTERNET, you PAY TAX in your country to pay for the INTERNET, as governments pay to subsidize the existence of the INTERNET. <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">How do societies and societies protect their own cultures? Your own ways of life, your own values and preserve your own freedoms? " </blockquote> The "culture" of people who "buy" the "culture" of other people do not have strength (culture) in their societies to provide their own culture for their people. Americans say "cosmos" to say sidereal space and the Russians say "OK" to say they agree. The Voice is a "sold" program for virtually ALL CULTURES on Earth, ... Got Talent and X Factor as well. What, exactly, do you mean with countries "losing" their cultures?" Google is a private company. You may want to refer to the creation of a Private Monopoly, as was done by the US Congress with the telephone. <span title="No governo Clinton, o mesmo Congresso dos USA quebrou o monopólio privado, anteriormente criado para proteger os interesses econômicos do inventor, OBRIGANDO a empresa privada a ser vendida para consituir um MERCADO no setor, já que não se justificava mais a proteção ao inventor.">In the Clinton administration, the same US Congress broke the private monopoly formerly created to protect the economic interests of the inventor, forcing the private company to be sold to become a MARKET in the industry, since there was no longer any justification for protecting the inventor. is this what you mean? I use google but I use more DuckDuckGo.com, other people can do the same, but DO NOT WANT. I use TOR - and google does not like you to use TOR and HARDS access to their computers when you use TOR - and I invest in MY SECURITY. I do not use FACEBOOK or INSTAGRAM or WHATSAPP for the same reasons: my INSECURITY and the SAFETY of those companies. I do not miss the "services" that those companies offer, where YOU ARE THE PRODUCT. And the amount of people who "sells" their private lives easily to those companies producing PROFIT is almost 20% of the Earth's population. You mean that companies are to blame? <span title="Você não concordaria se disesse que as mesmas pessoas que entregam suas vidas privadas para o lucro fácil de pessoas mais capazes são as CULPADAS por seus países e suas sociedades PERDEREM SUAS CULTURAS?">Would not you agree if you said that the same people who give away their private lives for the easy profit of better able people are the GUILTS of their countries and their societies LOSING THEIR CULTURES? But these people have HIGH EDUCATION and money. How would you explain this? That almost 20% of Earth's population is a terrorist? Traitors of their cultures and their homelands? <span title="Existem diversos Motores de Pesquisa que podem ser usados em Provedores de Serviços na Internet e em empresas privadas, especialmente em universidades e escolas de nível médio, incluindo agências de governo, mas o que você vê é uma universidade pública pagando para o Google para fazer a">There are several <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=open+source+search+engines&t=seamonkey&ia=web">Search Engines</a> that can be used in Internet Service Providers and private companies, especially in universities and mid-level schools, including government agencies, but what you see is a public university paying Google to do the documents in their academic environment. Even the university's information technology course DOES NOT DEVELOP RESEARCH in the area of textual information retrieval. <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">"Sphinx </blockquote><div class="gmail-mytechlogy_editor_frame" id="gmail-1439351103964_mytechlogy_editor_frame" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><blockquote> </blockquote><div class="gmail-mytechlogy_editor_text" id="gmail-mytechlogy_editor_text"><blockquote> <div style="clear:left;float:left;margin:0px 10px 0px 0px" id="gmail-mytechlogy_editor_image_cover"> <img class="gmail-mytechlogy_editor_image" alt="Top 5 Open Source Search Engines - Image 5" src="https://www.mytechlogy.com/upload/by_users/James/121508034506logo.png" style="max-width: 250px; border-width: medium; border-style: none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color; border-image: none;" id="gmail-1439351103964_mytechlogy_editor_image"> </div> </blockquote><div style="text-align:left"><blockquote><div>Sphinx is an open source full text search server that is programmed with relevant search quality and integration simplicity. </div><div>Sphinx allows flexible testing whereby its indexing features include full support for SBCS and UTF-8 encodings, stopword removal and optional hit position removal (hitless indexing); morphology and synonym processing through word forms dictionaries and stemmers; exceptions and blended characters; and many more.</div><div>Sphinx has an easy application integration that is derived from 3 different APIs. It has a native library for many programming languages, a pluggable storage engine for MySQL and an application query that uses MySQL client library and syntax. </div>Websites such as Craigslist, Living Social, MetaCafe and Groupon has adopted Sphinx for its searches. <div> </div><div><div>Programming Language: C++</div><div>License: GPLv2 and commercial </div><div>Ranking of search results: Versatile </div><div>Indexing style: SQL database indexing and Non-SQL storage indexing." </div></div></blockquote><div></div></div></div></div> No government agency from the countries you claim to be victims of Google (and other IT companies) uses, or research, retrieval of textual information in their corporate environments. And most of the societies you want to protect send their brains to compete for a job in Google and US IT companies. Is this American's FAULT? <span title="Você sonsidera errado empresas de alta tecnologia trabalharem em conjunto com o governo do páis que eles ajudam a sustentar com impostos e que lhes dão a SEGURANÇA DE UM MERCADO nacional e GLOBAL?">Do you misuse wrong high-tech companies working together with the government of the country that they help with taxes and give them national and global MARKET SAFETY? Which government do you think companies should help? To the government of Iran? To the government of Syria? To the government of Russia? To the government of China? Are you saying that US high-tech companies should pay taxes to CHINA ALSO? To be "good"? Are you saying that US IT companies should deliver their data encryption protocols to China? To be "good"? "The Internet is a global network." INTERNET is a NETWORK of computer networks and was created in the USA, and is owned by the US government. It only exists within the territory of the USA. Other nations may use it if they adhere to the protocols - which are OPEN and FREE ACCESS CODE for ALL EARTH INHABITANTS. "Use of that global network by dominant and large tech companies to empower single country military is evil. " The "bad" is not the use of a property by the owner, but those who are not owners want to have the right of the owner without doing anything for the existence of the property. What you are saying is that you are a "homeless" and those who have a roof have a duty to give you the roof. You could agree that there is a need for regulation to PROTECT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS of users of the INTERNET, with protocols - open like the ones in the network - to verify the correct use of the network. But this is another conversation and you do not want regulation to protect INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, you want a Digital State to intervene in national societies for IMPOR sanctions on individuals, and companies, because at the time of regular there is no distinction between person and company.</div></div>