[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02

Sascha,

Thank you for your input. Could you, during this phase, be a little clearer in regards to your reasons for objection. This is really a question for everyone contributing.

For instance, what about the suggested implementation is onerous or oppressive?

Thanks,

Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-wG

Brian Nisbet 
Network Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
+35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie www.heanet.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270


> -----Original Message-----
> From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of
> Sascha Luck [ml]
> Sent: Thursday 15 March 2018 17:04
> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
> >This proposal is a first step to catch low hanging fruit. Yes: there
> >are many things that can (should) be improved, but getting consensus on
> >these controversial topics is difficult. So the proposers are taking it
> >one step at a time. Based on the discussion on this mailing list those
> >steps apparently have to be very small, but at least there is the
> >possibility of movement :)
> 
> Correctly and perfectly summarised. A textbook example of early-stage frog-
> boiling.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog
> 
> The road to oppressive and onerous regulation is taken a small step at a time
> in the 21st century and that's why it is important to resist such attempts NOW
> while it is possible to do so without great personal sacrifice.
> 
> For the avoidance of doubt, the above constitutes (continuing) opposition to
> 2017-02.
> 
> rgds,
> Sascha Luck
>