[anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)

Hi Marco,

Thank you for the very good proposal.

The one of opposing arguments is:

> If organisations are not cooperative, the RIPE NCC ultimately has the possibility to
> close their RIPE NCC membership and deregister their Internet number resources.

How RIPE NCC is going to deal with not cooperative members/PI holders/Legacy holders?
I don't see anything in the proposal text. Is there any grounds for terminating membership
and/or deregistering resources?


--
Kind regards,
Sergey Myasoedov


Thursday, September 7, 2017, 1:59:07 PM, you wrote:

MS> Dear colleagues,

MS> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2017-02, "Regular abuse-c Validation", is now available for discussion.

MS> The goal of this proposal is to give the RIPE NCC a mandate to regularly validate "abuse-c:" information
MS> and to follow up in cases where contact information is found to be invalid.

MS> You can find the full proposal at:
MS> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2017-02

MS> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Discussion Phase
MS> is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer.

MS> At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the RIPE Working Group Chairs,
MS> decides how to proceed with the proposal.

MS> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
MS> <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 6 October 2017.

MS> Kind regards,

MS> Marco Schmidt
MS> Policy Development Officer
MS> RIPE NCC

MS> Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum