[anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity

Hi,

>> The presumed draft you're unhappy about
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vixie-dns-rpz/) is
>> informational. It is not a standard.
>>
> not yet a standard. operational word, I guess, is yet. so there is
> still time to create awareness and to speak out.

More than that, it hasn't yet been adopted by the dnsop working group in 
the IETF, where a similar discussion is happening, and I don't believe 
the authors have stated an aim for an individual submission RFC.

Raising awareness of RPZ is good, however it's an operational tool that 
many service providers and enterprises might want in their arsenal (even 
if as an opt-in).

The best place to discuss furthering (or otherwise) RPZ is likely to be 
on the IETF's dnsop list.

Cheers,
Rob