[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Agenda - AA-WG RIPE73

On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 19:14:32 +0530
Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we please stick to debating facts instead of fautuous analogies
> based on transmogrifying animals?
> What I am seeing here is a weird set of justifications of inaction
> based on improbable corner cases.
> Actual cases related to abuse enforcement (anonymized would be fine)
> are going to be far better than cows or donkeys.
> 

I did post an actual real world example of Hetzner.de (non anonymized)

You did not comment on that (in fact nobody did)

During the very long "Definition of abuse" thread - it became patently
clear that;

1. many people on this list has no idea what constitutes Internet abuse
(even if they did see it)

2. many people really need  transmogrifying animal examples - as they
struggle to understand the basic concepts. - Which I do not think is
the case so much any longer.


> On 04/10/16, 7:08 PM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ox"
> <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of andre at ox.co.za> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:12:10 +0300
>     Sergey <gforgx at fotontel.ru> wrote:
>     > Andre, that your cow is a donkey is purely your problem, not of
>     > the others subscribed to the mailing list.
>     
>     Please tell us all why you are saying that?
>     
>     Are you a cyber criminal and it is in your best interests to not
> have a definition of abuse?
>     
>     or why?
>     
>     what is your agenda?
>     
>     
>     
>     > On 10/04/16 15:49, ox wrote:
>     > > my cow is a donkey
>     > 
>     
>     
>     
> 
> 
>