[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Agenda - AA-WG RIPE73

Can we please stick to debating facts instead of fautuous analogies based on transmogrifying animals?

What I am seeing here is a weird set of justifications of inaction based on improbable corner cases.

Actual cases related to abuse enforcement (anonymized would be fine) are going to be far better than cows or donkeys.

On 04/10/16, 7:08 PM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ox" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of andre at ox.co.za> wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:12:10 +0300
    Sergey <gforgx at fotontel.ru> wrote:
    > Andre, that your cow is a donkey is purely your problem, not of the 
    > others subscribed to the mailing list.
    
    Please tell us all why you are saying that?
    
    Are you a cyber criminal and it is in your best interests to not have a
    definition of abuse?
    
    or why?
    
    what is your agenda?
    
    
    
    > On 10/04/16 15:49, ox wrote:
    > > my cow is a donkey
    >