[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

On 03/03/2016 23:13, Randy Bush wrote:
>> No.  It needs to contain accurate records of who has been delegated
>> responsibility for that (admin-c / org).
>>
>> abuse-c is a way to ease finding the *right* contacts instead of always
>> having to write paper mail to the company CEO - and that makes sense,
>> but it's a convenience to operators (as is tech-c), and in no means
>> required for the function as registry.
>>
>> Which might conincide with the fact that the paperwork you sign when
>> opening a LIR has no field for abuse-c...
>
> bingo
>
> i suspect this may derive from the ncc mixing the registration data with
> the irr data in a single whois hell.  newer folk seem to think they are
> the same.

...whilst the older folk are creating a new hell by clinging to the past 
and burying their heads in the sand...

cheers
denis

>
> randy
>