[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:26:18 +0900
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> > I may be in za physically, but the infrastructure of my current
> > employers are in EU, anyway, as you said already it is a convenience
> > for ops to have abuse-c but the point is that it is actually
> > convenient for a whole lot of others (incl me)
> it would be a convenience to me for you to send me €1000/mo, and i am
> sure many other sould line up.  let's make it mandatory.
> if you want to tell others how to run their networks, go to arin.
> 
I think the point you are missing is that nobody is telling anyone how
to manage their allocated resources.

You seem to be stuck on this that someone is trying to tell you how to
do something.

This is not the case.

What I am saying is that that the responsible people/person/group/company/organization 
should be easy to identify in terms of abuse

And, that ALL your data is accurate on the ncc db, otherwise, what is
the point of any data anyway?