[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

[ i may be totally misunderstanding things here, but i never bought
  mandatory abuse-c in the first place ]


so the idea is we mandate that there be an abuse-c: so that there is an
email address where we can send mail to which there will be no response?

i am hesitant to mandate behavior beyond that necessary for the ncc to
maintain accurate records of resource 'ownership'.  beyond that is me
telling someone else how to run their network.  i suspect they will
listen to their management before they listen to me, and rightly so.

randy