This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 11:08:09 CEST 2016
I think the term that's being collectively groped for is whether ripe ncc has a reporting obligation in case it discovers criminal activity The number of cases where such reporting is mandatory in law and not simply a matter of good citizenship is rather limited - threat to life, kidnap, etc. --srs On 17-Aug-2016, at 2:26 PM, Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: >> When anyone commits fraud to obtain a resource from RIPE, RIPE has the >> responsibility to file criminal charges against that criminal. >> >> I am not saying that I think RIPE should file criminal charges, I am >> saying that not doing so is in itself a questionable action. > > Well, to be pedantic, *criminal* charges are filed by the police > or other law-enforcment body, not by companies. :) > > Rob > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160817/d372c32c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]