This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Wed Aug 17 11:05:37 CEST 2016
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:56:05 +0100 Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: > > When anyone commits fraud to obtain a resource from RIPE, RIPE has > > the responsibility to file criminal charges against that criminal. > > > > I am not saying that I think RIPE should file criminal charges, I am > > saying that not doing so is in itself a questionable action. > > Well, to be pedantic, *criminal* charges are filed by the police > or other law-enforcment body, not by companies. :) > Rob Hello Rob, Okay, thank you I stand corrected! :) Please accept the singular word change from "charges" to read "complaint" Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]