This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Wed Aug 17 10:24:44 CEST 2016
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:11:44 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > ox <andre at ox.co.za> you wrote: > >Are fake whois records abuse? I think this is an excellent question > >and requires discussion. > >Personally I think filing fake information to a resource is actually > >a crime called fraud. I am sure that this is also a crime under > >Dutch law and that the Dutch Law enforcement should investigate this? > > Why yes! (Now why didn't *I* think of that?) > Yes, by all means, let's take a violation of contractual terms between > two private parties and turn it into a law enforcement matter. And I am not sure what you mean, maybe you can explain it to me better? When one private person/organization steals another private person/organization's car, it is not theft? When one private party lies, cheats and fraudulently obtains something from another party, it is not fraud? Because why? Because they are "private parties" ? I am so sorry that I am slow in understanding this and than you so much for taking the time to explain this to me Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]