[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

ox <andre at ox.co.za> you wrote:

>Are fake whois records abuse? I think this is an excellent question and
>requires discussion.
>
>Personally I think filing fake information to a resource is actually a
>crime called fraud. I am sure that this is also a crime under Dutch law
>and that the Dutch Law enforcement should investigate this?

Why yes!  (Now why didn't *I* think of that?)

Yes, by all means, let's take a violation of contractual terms between
two private parties and turn it into a law enforcement matter.  And
while we're at it, let's have Interpol come out to your house and cuff
you for those rental DVDs you returned 2 days late.

Yes, that's obviously the best choice, and the best possible use of
limited law enforcement resources.  And look at how well it worked
out in the Aaron Swartz case!

So I'm sure your're right.

But you shouldn't rely on just _my_ humble opinion.  Why not ask the
RIPE NCC legal team how many of those 7 cases of non-financial contract
breaches in 2015 and 2016 they called in law enforcement on.  I'm sure
they'll tell you they did so in all 7 cases...

... or maybe not.

>But, imho, fake whois records and/or incorrect whois records, is not
>abuse.

Yes.  What the hell!  Let's just turn off the RIPE WHOIS server and then
everything will be so much simpler and straightforward.  At least then
we won't have to wonder anymore.  Instead we will be SURE that none of
us has the least clue who is actually using which IP ranges, or who takes
responsibility for any of them.

A rational choice, if ever there was one.


Regards,
rfg