This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Aug 11 10:19:11 CEST 2016
Ronald, It's possible nobody here can (although I wouldn't want to speak for everyone). Those questions should more properly be directed towards the RIPE NCC, or, more likely, the RIPE NCC Executive Board, all of whom are lovely people. The latter can be reached at exec-board at ripe.net I'm happy to pass this query on on your behalf? Brian Brian Nisbet, Network Operations Manager HEAnet Limited, Ireland's Education and Research Network 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1 Registered in Ireland, no 275301 tel: +35316609040 fax: +35316603666 web: http://www.heanet.ie/ On 11/08/2016 07:00, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <B6A12EA1-F7E0-422B-99B9-40F4B5C63121 at a2b-internet.com>, > Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote: > >> May I propose to do a call and explain a bit about the community and the NCC >> roles ? And the WG's etc ? > > Thanks for the generous offer Eric, but I am fine for now, I think. > > Anyway, I think it is better, actually, if some of my questions get > answered here, in public, on the mailing list. Then I can refer to > those answers later on, when someone tells me my proposal is crap. :-) > > I am still awaiting answers to the following very important questions, > which I have already posted. Surely _someone_ must know the answers, > and the answers should be quite simple, not even worthy of taking up > any voice time, as the answers should not need any explaining: > > In the entire history of RIPE NCC, as a formal association under Dutch > law, has there ever been any instance in which The Association has > applied either Section 6.1(b) or Section 6.1(e) of the Articles of > Association? If so, on how many separate occasions have such terminations > occured? > > With respect to each such instance, if any, has The Association obeyed > in full the stipulation, as to its own behavior, which is contained > within Section 10.5 of the Articles of Association? > > Can no one really answer these rather rudimentary questions? > > > Regards, > rfg >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]