[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter

In message <B6A12EA1-F7E0-422B-99B9-40F4B5C63121 at a2b-internet.com>, 
Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote:

>May I propose to do a call and explain a bit about the community and the NCC
> roles ? And the WG's etc ?

Thanks for the generous offer Eric, but I am fine for now, I think.

Anyway, I think it is better, actually, if some of my questions get
answered here, in public, on the mailing list.  Then I can refer to
those answers later on, when someone tells me my proposal is crap. :-)

I am still awaiting answers to the following very important questions,
which I have already posted.  Surely _someone_ must know the answers,
and the answers should be quite simple, not even worthy of taking up
any voice time, as the answers should not need any explaining:

   In the entire history of RIPE NCC, as a formal association under Dutch
   law, has there ever been any instance in which The Association has
   applied either Section 6.1(b) or Section 6.1(e) of the Articles of
   Association?  If so, on how many separate occasions have such terminations
   occured?
   
   With respect to each such instance, if any, has The Association obeyed
   in full the stipulation, as to its own behavior, which is contained
   within Section 10.5 of the Articles of Association?

Can no one really answer these rather rudimentary questions?


Regards,
rfg