[anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!

On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:29:09 +0530
Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/08/16, 5:51 PM, "anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of
> andre at ox.co.za" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of
> andre at ox.co.za> wrote:
> > how do you know that it is not some law enforcement effort at
> > entrapment of criminals?
> And how do I know that you, or any other of the naysayers opposing
> these policies, actually have any sort of a background or job role
> related to abuse management instead of merely allocating IP addresses
> or operating DNS?  Linkedin, I guess.
> 
As for me, I operate actual public blacklists - I list scammers,
spammers, phish, child pornographers, criminals and other abuse...

http://ascams.com/configuring-ascams-com-dns-lists/

I also track bots, botnets and abuse as well as criminal technology

I also publish Internet scams, warnings, guides and other resources and
I have eight sites and servers all related to the same thing...

So, my own abuse involvement is in the public domain.

> In any case, drilling down on one case isn’t the issue here.
> Preventing the misappropriation of v4 address space by these entities
> is more to the point here, though I doubt it will ever be discussed
> in a usable manner, given the hackneyed arguments raised here over
> the years.
> 
No, respectfully, I disagree with you again.

There needs to be a discussion about the due process systems to
retrieve abused public resources.

My superblock.ascams.com blacklist is now sometimes running at between
3million and as much as 4,2 million abuse ipv4's...

 - There are no false positives in my lists - not even a one. 
If a number is listed it has sent phish. spam, scams and/or other criminal or abuse activity.

Andre







> --srs
> 
> 
>