This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 14:59:09 CEST 2016
On 09/08/16, 5:51 PM, "anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of andre at ox.co.za" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > how do you know that it is not some law enforcement effort at > entrapment of criminals? And how do I know that you, or any other of the naysayers opposing these policies, actually have any sort of a background or job role related to abuse management instead of merely allocating IP addresses or operating DNS? Linkedin, I guess. In any case, drilling down on one case isn’t the issue here. Preventing the misappropriation of v4 address space by these entities is more to the point here, though I doubt it will ever be discussed in a usable manner, given the hackneyed arguments raised here over the years. --srs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]