[anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database

Hi Brian

On 06/11/2015 11:29, Brian Nisbet wrote:
> Denis,
> On 05/11/2015 19:40, ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> HI all
>>
>> I am going to have one last go at solving this problem. I challenge
>> anyone/everyone to tell me why this is such a stupid idea, technically
>> impossible to do, won't solve any of the issues partially or fully. Then
>> I can shut up about it and go away. If you can't condemn the idea then
>> support it. Lets fix this issue once and for all, stop this endless
>> discussion about rogue ROUTE objects and get on with life.
>>
>> So here is my 4 step proposal that I believe could be implemented within
>> a month. If we implemented this you can be sure that all ROUTE objects
>> in the RIPE Database were created with the knowledge and approval of the
>> related resource holders. I believe that is the desired goal.
>
> Thanks for this. I think I would agree with Gert's comments about Step 4
> and the timings, but that's implementation detail to a certain extent.
> It and other timings would be something to discuss with the NCC.
>
> The big, procedural, question to get this moved along is whether this is
> AA-WG or DB-WG. To be clear, I'm very happy to work with you on it
> either way. I'm going to have a quick chat with the DB-WG chairs and we
> can crank up the PDP as soon as possible, if that's ok with you?

That sounds like a great idea :)

cheers
denis

>
> Brian
>