[anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database

Denis,
On 05/11/2015 19:40, ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> HI all
>
> I am going to have one last go at solving this problem. I challenge
> anyone/everyone to tell me why this is such a stupid idea, technically
> impossible to do, won't solve any of the issues partially or fully. Then
> I can shut up about it and go away. If you can't condemn the idea then
> support it. Lets fix this issue once and for all, stop this endless
> discussion about rogue ROUTE objects and get on with life.
>
> So here is my 4 step proposal that I believe could be implemented within
> a month. If we implemented this you can be sure that all ROUTE objects
> in the RIPE Database were created with the knowledge and approval of the
> related resource holders. I believe that is the desired goal.

Thanks for this. I think I would agree with Gert's comments about Step 4 
and the timings, but that's implementation detail to a certain extent. 
It and other timings would be something to discuss with the NCC.

The big, procedural, question to get this moved along is whether this is 
AA-WG or DB-WG. To be clear, I'm very happy to work with you on it 
either way. I'm going to have a quick chat with the DB-WG chairs and we 
can crank up the PDP as soon as possible, if that's ok with you?

Brian