This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Nov 5 03:29:47 CET 2015
Hi Ronald > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:10:01PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> I'm just putting myself in their shoes. If I were them, and I was >> asked my opinion about something that, in the short run at least. >> would, increase my workload, I would scream, holler, tear my >> hair out, pound my fist on the table, and insist that the whole thing >> is absolutely positively technically infeasible, and that even if >> it isn't, it will still cost fifty billion dollars and take ten >> years to fully implement. You have the wrong idea about how the RIPE NCC works. This is not a commercial company. So if the community/members asks for something that is expensive, well guess who pays for it :) There are a lot of clever engineers and analysts at the NCC in the prime of their careers. They like a technical challenge. You ask them to do something hard and they will love you :) It is not the NCC that puts the brake on ideas. They provide technical advice during discussions and do an impact analysis if a consensus is reached. But that is where the problem often occurs. Trying to get a consensus when there are many different views and strong opinions. cheers denis > > The NCC Impact Statement is actually a formal part of the policy > development process nowadays. It details how the proposed policy > change affects the various departments, the manpower > requirements, how much it'll cost, whether there are any legal > problems with it, etc. I've not seen it happen but I'm sure > there is a theoretical possibility that they'll say "Can't be > done" but they'll also detail why and then the policy can be > changed accordingly. >> Are there any countries within the RIPE region that would allow >> one of their citizens to register to vote if that citizen gave >> his mailing address as "99999 Pluto Way, Mars, Milky Way" ? If > > No idea, all I can say is that in Ireland you will give them your > correct address and they'll still scratch you off the register > because of "wrong address". I call it the Disenfranchise > Department. Maybe in other places you can register without an > address or a bogus one. > > rgds, > Sascha Luck >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]