[anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))

> >Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be very high..
>
> Forgive me, but this opinion is based on what, exactly?
>
> And what exactly are we talking about when we say "exception"?
>

I could be wrong in this assumption. So lets ask RIPE NCC (secretariat) how
many bounce email they get for membership renewal notices every year?
Billing contact is suppose to be the most up to date contact and failing to
pay may suspend/cancel your membership (after 120 days).


> Are we talking about contact phone numbers that don't work anymore
> because of the unfortunate tendency of company PBX systems to be
> located in precarious proxmity to Tesla Coils?  Or are we taking
> about organizations and individuals that use cell phones as their
> primary contact numbers, where said cell phones have been re-materized
> in another dimension, e.g. while their owners were on the subway,
> or perhaps ones that were unwisely taken out on hunting trips with
> Dick Cheney?
>

Quite Ingenious I would say :)


>
> Regards,
> rfg
>
> --
Best Wishes,

Aftab A. Siddiqui
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20151103/aea8a3d2/attachment.html>