This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Nov 3 04:29:23 CET 2015
In message <CAK5YLge94OTETmzt_9hMPphrkYJB0SJ_q87aFPPHmRuSYMrVJg at mail.gmail.com> Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com> wrote: >Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be very high.. Forgive me, but this opinion is based on what, exactly? And what exactly are we talking about when we say "exception"? Are we talking about contact phone numbers that don't work anymore because of the unfortunate tendency of company PBX systems to be located in precarious proxmity to Tesla Coils? Or are we taking about organizations and individuals that use cell phones as their primary contact numbers, where said cell phones have been re-materized in another dimension, e.g. while their owners were on the subway, or perhaps ones that were unwisely taken out on hunting trips with Dick Cheney? Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]